The following outlines steps 1 to 6 to be followed to determine the scope of project for a major development proposal with specific regulatory triggers under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and reach a decision about the project, as illustrated in the flowcharts contained in Annex 2 of the Cabinet Directive. Steps 7 to 11 are illustrated in a separate flowchart and are described below.
Hold discussions among potential responsible authorities (RAs), federal authorities (FAs), the Province and proponent to identify interests, explore opportunities for cooperation and facilitate preparation of a well-defined development proposal description by the proponent.
Hold Project Committee discussions to:
Identify non-trigger components in consideration of the criteria outlined in the "Approach" section of the Interim Approach. Non-trigger components would not be included in the scope of project if they will be considered through provincial or other mechanisms or if consideration of the component is not warranted. Otherwise they may be included in the scope of project.
Confirm components and secure RA and FA written agreement on roles and responsibilities and work plan.
The following outlines steps 7 to 11 to be followed to determine the scope of project for a major development proposal with specific regulatory triggers under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and reach a decision about the project, as illustrated in the flowcharts contained in Annex 2 of the Cabinet Directive. Steps 1 to 6 are illustrated in a separate flowchart and are described above.
Identify requirements to assess potential environmental effects and consider other CEAA factors. For trigger components this is led by the RA with support of FAs. For non-trigger components this is led by the FA with support of the RA and other FAs. Considerations are to include the division of responsibility as per the work plan, with FAs assuming responsibility for CEAA requirements for components of the proposed development that they have suggested for inclusion in the scope of project, and RAs assuming responsibility for CEAA requirements associated with triggered components.
Determine if requirements can be met through federal participation in a cooperative EA process (this will be based on RA and FA agreement to participate in a cooperative environmental assessment to address federal requirements), or if separate federal direction to the proponent is required.
In cases where some or all federal requirements cannot be addressed though a cooperative environmental assessment, RAs and FAs may be required to work directly with the proponent. The goal should remain that the proponent responds to both federal and provincial requirements in a single Environmental Impact Statement.
Determine the mechanism (federal or other) to ensure implementation of mitigation measures and follow-up. As per the Directive, responsibility for leading on implementation of mitigation measures and follow-up connected to non-trigger component(s) rests with FAs.