Leave the text-only version and return to the original page view.Leave the text-only version and return to the original page view.

Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

Using Ecological Standards, Guidelines and Objectives for Determining Significance: An Examination of Existing Information to Support Significance Decisions Involving Wetlands

Appendix 3 - Source Name: Ontario Provincial Policy Statement

Appendix 3: Candidate Ecological Benchmark

Source Type: Laws or Policies (and related guidelines)

Source Name: Ontario Provincial Policy Statement

Number:4/10

Benchmark:
Development and site alteration will not be permitted in…significant wetlands south and east of the Canadian Shield.

Applies to whom: Ontario planning authorities "shall have regard to" policy statements

Applies to what: Significant wetlands

Applies where: South and east of Canadian Shield

Reference:
Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 1997. Provincial Policy Statement. Revised February 1, 1997. Queen's Printer. Toronto, Ontario.

Evaluation:

Effective: 6

Effective Comments:
In combination with maps of sensitive wetlands or Ontario Wetland Evaluation System, does not permit any development or site alteration on significant wetlands: any alteration whatsoever on certain wetlands is deemed significant.

Authoritative: 4

Authoritative Comments:
Province of Ontario policy statement, under Planning Act

Relevant: 5

Relevant Comments: Most, although not explicitly

Sound: 5

Sound Comments:
Statements based on scientific knowledge of wetland issues

Straightforward: 6

Straightforward Comments:

Practical: 3

Practical Comments: Functional assessment required

Total Effective + Authority Score: 10

Total Overall Score: 28


Number:9/12

Benchmark:
Development and site alteration may be permitted on adjacent lands to significant wetlands south and east of the Canadian Shield and in the Canadian Shield if it has been demonstrated that there are no negative impacts on the natural features or on the ecological functions for which the area is identified.

Applies to whom:
Ontario planning authorities "shall have regard to" policy statements

Applies to what: Adjacent lands to significant wetlands

Applies where:
All Ontario: south and east of Canadian Shield, and in the Canadian Shield

Reference:
Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 1997. Provincial Policy Statement. Revised February 1, 1997. Queen's Printer. Toronto, Ontario.

Evaluation:

Effective: 5

Effective Comments:
In combination with maps of sensitive wetlands or Ontario Wetland Evaluation System, does not permit any adverse effects on lands adjacent to significant wetlands: adverse effects on lands adjacent to significant wetlands, are by implication, deemed significant

Authoritative: 4

Authoritative Comments:
Province of Ontario policy statement, under Planning Act

Relevant: 5

Relevant Comments: Most, although not explicitly

Sound: 5

Sound Comments:
Statements based on scientific knowledge of wetland issues

Straightforward: 6

Straightforward Comments:

Practical: 3

Practical Comments:
Functional assessment on wetlands still challenges resource managers in Canada

Total Effective + Authority Score: 10

Total Overall Score: 28


Number: 10/11

Benchmark:
Development and site alteration will be permitted in…significant wetlands in the Canadian Shield…if it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or the ecological functions for which the area is identified.

Applies to whom:
Ontario planning authorities "shall have regard to" policy statements

Applies to what: Significant wetlands

Applies where: Canadian Shield

Reference:
Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 1997. Provincial Policy Statement. Revised February 1, 1997. Queen's Printer. Toronto, Ontario.

Evaluation:

Effective: 5

Effective Comments:
In combination with maps of sensitive wetlands or Ontario Wetland Evaluation System, does not permit any adverse effects on features or functions of significant wetlands: adverse effects on significant wetlands are, by implication, significant.

Authoritative: 4

Authoritative Comments:
Province of Ontario policy statement, under Planning Act

Relevant: 5

Relevant Comments: Most, although not explicitly

Sound: 5

Sound Comments:
Statements based on scientific knowledge of wetland issues

Straightforward: 6

Straightforward Comments:

Practical: 3

Practical Comments:
Functional assessment on wetlands still challenges resource managers in Canada

Total Effective + Authority Score: 10

Total Overall Score: 28

Appendix 3 - Laws or Policies (and related guidelines) |

<< Previous  Page 18   Next >>

Common menu bar links

Institutional links